Comments on: Creating Simple Visual Effects Using JQuery Instead of Adobe Flash http://www.webdesignbeach.com/beachbar/simple-visual-effects-using-jquery Web Design Beach Bar Thu, 17 May 2012 00:18:08 +0000 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.5.1 By: Mobile Dev http://www.webdesignbeach.com/beachbar/simple-visual-effects-using-jquery#comment-1554 Mobile Dev Sun, 12 Sep 2010 04:45:41 +0000 http://www.webdesignbeach.com/beachbar/?p=30#comment-1554 You said "Flash Player plug-in is not available for the iPhone and many other cell phones." I don't agree with it, now iPhone is the only one brand which not support flash but other brands such as Windows Phone7 Series, Symbian and also Android are work together closely with Adobe to make their mobile OS to support Flash. You said “Flash Player plug-in is not available for the iPhone and many other cell phones.”
I don’t agree with it, now iPhone is the only one brand which not support flash but other brands such as Windows Phone7 Series, Symbian and also Android are work together closely with Adobe to make their mobile OS to support Flash.

]]> By: riksruin http://www.webdesignbeach.com/beachbar/simple-visual-effects-using-jquery#comment-1513 riksruin Tue, 01 Jun 2010 19:27:33 +0000 http://www.webdesignbeach.com/beachbar/?p=30#comment-1513 I can't agree with you more, whilst flash isn't completely redundant. It does mostly depend on where your visitors are coming from and their purpose on your site. Commercial users will just want to get in find what they want and move onto the next site. I can’t agree with you more, whilst flash isn’t completely redundant. It does mostly depend on where your visitors are coming from and their purpose on your site. Commercial users will just want to get in find what they want and move onto the next site.

]]> By: Vladimir http://www.webdesignbeach.com/beachbar/simple-visual-effects-using-jquery#comment-1511 Vladimir Tue, 01 Jun 2010 09:54:05 +0000 http://www.webdesignbeach.com/beachbar/?p=30#comment-1511 This post is very interesting. I would say that purpose of Flash is not to create small animation effects, it's just an addition. However, i would just add few more lines in your research: 1. if you need only one, small animation effect on the site, then including jQuery library (24KB) is waste of bandwidth. 2. to have a lot of animation effects on the site may slowdown JS run-time and may cost much more in matter of time, you might spend much more time building animated site with jQuery then by using Flash. 3. jQuery developers are cheaper then Flash developers, even if you compared feature-ish sites :) 4. i like jQuery because i've never learnt Flash, so jQuery wins in any case :) If you ask me, the result should be: jQuery 3:2 Flash Cheers! This post is very interesting. I would say that purpose of Flash is not to create small animation effects, it’s just an addition. However, i would just add few more lines in your research:

1. if you need only one, small animation effect on the site, then including jQuery library (24KB) is waste of bandwidth.

2. to have a lot of animation effects on the site may slowdown JS run-time and may cost much more in matter of time, you might spend much more time building animated site with jQuery then by using Flash.

3. jQuery developers are cheaper then Flash developers, even if you compared feature-ish sites :)

4. i like jQuery because i’ve never learnt Flash, so jQuery wins in any case :)

If you ask me, the result should be:

jQuery 3:2 Flash

Cheers!

]]>